Import Structure Test

[Thinking]
The user is asking about nesting structure for traceability. Key considerations: readability vs semantic accuracy. Deep nesting preserves parent-child chain but becomes hard to navigate. Sibling replies keep depth manageable but lose the thinking→response relationship visually. Worth testing both to see how Talkyard renders them.

[Claude Response]
For forum-based conversation traceability, sibling replies work better than deep nesting. Both thinking and response attach directly to the human prompt, keeping Claude's actual response at a readable depth while preserving the relationship to the thinking that preceded it.

[Human]
Can you give an example of how the sibling approach would look in practice?[Claude Response]
For forum-based conversation traceability, sibling replies work better than deep nesting. Both thinking and response attach directly to the human prompt, keeping Claude's actual response at a readable depth while preserving the relationship to the thinking that preceded it.

What is the best way to structure nested conversations in a forum for traceability?